State Assembly Elections 2017

Implications of State Elections 2017

The past month begin with a series of elections throughout India for five states, namely Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Manipur, Goa and Uttarakhand. Uttar Pradesh elections have always been more than just another state elections. One of the biggest states of the Indian geography, this region sends maximum number of MPs from any state. Most Prime Ministers have been from UP. However this time it has become even more significant in the wake of intolerance debate, ghar-wapasi, demonetisation and Modi's performance after coming into power. Let us see what does this election and other state elections really mean to the politics of India.








Modi wave has not burned out.
His landslide victory in a agricultural-based state economy ,where a sizeable population is small farmers , landless labourers despite the inconvenient demonetisation drive which hit poorest the hardest, proves his charishma over the people of the country. And these elections were all fought in his name. This clearly shows that his popularity among the masses hasn't faded with time.

AAP is still not a national party
AAP certainly created a hole in the two-party electoral contest of Punjab. The Indian diaspora of Punjab were supporting AAP from abroad. A lot of them in fact came to the state and campaigned for the party till the voting. Rival parties link this support with separatist movement alleging the party from supporting Khalistanis and thus being a threat to nation's integrity. Also AAP's over-enthusiastc appeasement for the majority in achieving seats is thought to be reason of its poor performance. However in Goa, AAP was not even in the main fight in any constituency where it secured merely 6.3% of total votes. Its candidates came in third in only a couple of constituencies. Even CM candidate Elvis Gomes finished fourth in the constituency. The party fielded professionals such as doctors and architects in amny seats. People at large were evidentl not convinced about their ability to get little things done -like getting admissions, loans and electricity connections- that people outside the networks of influence seek from their representatives. So despite tremendous efforts AAP could not establish itself as a 'national' party(not just in the technical sense).


Muslims are neglected in state elections
Not a single seat was given to Muslims by BJP in the UP election, where a sizeable chunk of people belongs to the community. Muslims may be claimed by the BJP to have voted for them as they secured three-fourths majority but it is a truth that a lot of their votes got divided between BSP and SP. A JNU professor wrote 'The election campaign was based upon the communalised development. The BJP repeatedly told Hindu voters how Hindus were neglected for the sake of minority appeasement, which has been the practice of past governments.' Till the time of writing this article, Yogi Adityanath has sworn as a chief minister of the Utter Pradesh. Originally Ajay Singh Bisht, Yogi, a firebrand leader with his Hindutava agenda, is notorious for his controversial remarks over muslims and Pakistan.

The way things would go in UP, will decide the agenda of Bhartiya Janta Party in 2019 elections. Modi would come with a strict Hindutava agenda if Yogi's tenure would be accepted by the mainstream of the country. However there is a possibility that sending extremist leaders to the top dilutes their passion for majority and repulsion for minority( what happened with Modi on being elected as PM. In 2002 he was a hardcore Hindutava extremist leader).

Congress made a comeback
Congress start winning seats after a series of humiliating defeats in Lok sabha elections 0f 2014 and various states across the country. INC won maximum number of seats in Punjab, Goa and Manipur. However due to lack of clear majority and nation-wide dominance of BJP, they couldn't get support from other parties and failed to make coalition governments. This might be relief to those who believe in importance of opposition in working of democracy.

Irom Sharmila faced a stunning defeat
The world renowned human rights activist Irom Sharmila, who held a 16 year long hunger strike against the draconian AFSPA act lost her first election against the former chief minister of the state. She got merely 90 votes, which was even less than NOTA( None of The Above). This came as a huge shock to human right activists across the country. Critics cited it to her stated reason of marriage for quitting her fast as the key in her defeat( which is unplausible, as she wanted to come to power for action against AFSPA act).


 And after the elections this is how India looks like:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The echo chambers of Indian Politics: How Facebook pages are ruining political discourse in the democracy

Image
Conservatives and liberals are two broad groups in any political system. While conservatives value established social structure, respect religion and take culture as to be an authoritative source of public conduct, liberals emphasise upon individual rights, reject religion's orthodoxy and focus upon ‘liberty’ as the basis of any political society. Consequently, the two groups differ on various issues such as policy, health, secutriy and this difference becomes the basis of discourse in the system. In recent times, the rise of internet and social media have drastically changed the way discourse takes place in democracies around the world. Though it is true that internet has significantly transferred power in hands of people as almost everyone has access to smart phones and 4g internet (in fact, I have seen the lowest rung of society such as garbage collectors to enjoy smartphones in their hands- According to a report, 500 million people will have access to internet by June 2...
Read more

Is Caste Politics Assertion Politics?

Image
I was reading a piece during elections in an independent news website. Check the link to the article in the end. It was titled: Assertion Politics: Not identity Politics. I must say it had hell of an insight. Nobody thinks it that way; atleast I never did. Only those who have been themselves affected by Caste-inequality at some point of their lives could feel it in that manner. Or those who have a firsthand experience of working with people of oppressed caste could think that way. For me, it was something entirely new. I had always seen caste-politics as something unfortunate, primitive, illogical and anti-development. While it is true that it does qualify for all these adjectives, however it forgets the fact that for some, caste is as basic as food and water. They live in a society which had associated their entire life around a particular 'class'. And this has been from centuries. Democracy is relatively ve...
Read more

Paris Treaty and the USA

Image
Trump recently created headlines by moving out of the Paris Treaty. Certainly, it is a matter of concern-the Biggest Superpower has stepped out of an agreement, which atleast on paper, endeavours to save the Earth. However, in order to know the implications of the withdrawal of US from the treaty, it has to be understood that what exactly is Paris Treaty. One, it is all about not letting humans increase the global temperature by 2% till end of the century. The countries themselves have to set targets as BIG as possible to meet the target of not increasing the global temperature by 2% by the end of the century, preferably 1.5%. Two, the Paris Treaty is non-punitive. That means there are no punishments if the countries did not meet their self-created targets. That is had Trump not announced withdrawal from the treaty, no one could have forced him to meet the targets. But given the loud and nasty way Trump runs the administration, he declared withdrawal. And this stunned media ...
Read more